Thoughts for Food
FOOD SECURITY--Having enough supply to feed mouths? Or reducing number of mouths to meet "globally sustainable" supply?
Welcome the Reaper
Yesterday’s Gettr livestream by Ben Harnwell connected major dots, deftly capturing what can only be described as the malevolent out-of-touch-ness of our globalist overlords in jeopardizing the FOOD SECURITY of an entire planet.
Ostensibly, they are leading us down the skeleton-strewn path to please some equally clueless children (Greta, AOC, Bernie). But thinking about it from a hard-nosed, numbers-based approach, the quickest and easiest way to relieve the crushing liabilities Western institutions have piled up is to reduce the number of people lining up for payouts.
Enter The Reaper.
Analysis
While FOOD SECURITY is still registering as little more than a blip in the US, we are seeing significant movement in the global news corpus over the last sixty days.
Until this year, FOOD SECURITY has been a wonkish term that got traction back in 2013 with the sale of Smithfield Foods to Shuanghui International. To date it was the largest Chinese takeover of a US company which, however justified to regulators, was regarded by the CCP as a strategic asset capture.
This year, FOOD SECURITY had been trending steadily out of a 90D moving average of 5.77 WPM, when on May 11, India’s government announced an immediate ban on wheat exports in response to panic buying by Ukraine’s customers. That spiked FOOD SECURITY to an all-time high of 33.8 WPM, and unprecedented volatility as the discussion cascades through international community.
India’s export ban was followed by a May 19 UN meeting on global food security, and robust discussion in the global media, mostly on how turn FOOD SECURITY into a cudgel to take over for a tiring CLIMATE CHANGE and fellow "inequities."
But people’s stomachs are not as easily manipulated as their brains. By the end of June we were seeing attacks on India in the Australian press over the restrictions, to which the universally unpopular leaders of the G7 tossed a $5 billion sop. The term continued to resonate, however, over the Fourth of July holiday, to the Netherlands, and to the Phillipines.
FOOD SECURITY is not a tsunami— it’s now averaging 13.6 WPM— almost 2X its previous but still well under the critical 50 WPM threshold where the average news consumer hears it at least once a day.
But it is spreading globally, with two other unique data points worth mentioning— volatility and collocates.
While FOOD SECURITY is still a tertiary term as far as the overall volume in the news corpus, volatility mirrors its currently most active term ABORTION.
The less than -1.0 slope depicted below is the classic “Malwords at Work” indicator when a term is active and has momentum. Expect FOOD SECURITY to become more influential in the news language over the next 90-180 days.
Another fun fact is in the collocates, i.e. terms found within +/- 4 words of each other in the news corpus.
#1 FOOD-colocated term is DRUG;
#2 is SECURITY;
#3 is ADMINISTRATION
Never seen until this year.
Call To Action: Fight the Reaper
There is going to be a lot of fighting over who has FOOD SECURITY, as well as over who owns the term.
Before the Great Reset, FOOD SECURITY meant producing or having access to enough food to feed all mouths.
Under the New World Order, it will mean managing the number of mouths to consume the food that the planet can sustainably produce.
What better way to reset that number to baseline than by war and famine?
Support the Dutch farmers, who see where this is all going—Sri Lanka. Stop fighting fires breaking out across the globe. Start fighting the arsonists torching our world.
About Malwords
Malwords are keywords weaponized for information warfare. They function within public discourse as intellectual malware, verbal viruses designed to spread quickly for the purposes of a) silencing dissent through control of language, narrative, and speech, b) increasing public tolerance for government-sanctioned atrocity and c) emboldening officials to commit acts of atrocity.
Malword strength is measured by their frequency of appearance in the published body of language (corpus), and expressed in words per million (WPM) linguistic units (words, numbers, symbols, acronyms, etc).
Malword WPM’s typically follow a three-phase lifecycle: Pre-Curve test-markets the new term and puts up the store front; Curve, or Core, is launch phase, characterized by a rapid, exponential liftoff and sudden plunge; Post-Curve is a long, asymptotic tail and is the period in which primary-objective atrocities are implemented.
If you enjoyed, please subscribe… And leave a comment!
Harvey Oxenhorn, is a cybersecurity consultant, founder of Malwords Weekly, and author of the upcoming book, The Atrocity Algorithm, How The Media Became The Enemy of The People. He writes The Five Stages of Unf*ck, Red Pill Journey to January 2.0. , also on Substack. Follow him on Gettr, Gab, and MeWe @HarveyOxenhorn